Karnataka court grants interim stay on distribution, sale of book on Tipu Sultan | Mint – Mint

The order issued imposed a temporary injunction restraining the author, publisher Ayodhya Publication and printer Rashtrotthana Mudranalaya from selling the book titled ‘Tipu Nija Kanasugalu’
Amid the ongoing dispute concerning VD Savarkar and Tipu Sultan that started from the Shivamogga district of Karnataka, a court in the state has imposed temporary stay on the sale and distribution of books on Tipu Sultan in the state. The problems started when two groups entered into a heated argument over the installation of a banner with a picture Hindutva icon Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and 18th century Mysuru ruler Tipu Sultan at the Amir Ahmad Circle on the occasion of Independence Day.
The temporary ban in sale and distribution of books on Tipu Sultan, includes a book that describe the ruler’s governance on the erstwhile Mysuru Kingdom. The Karnataka court cited the fact that the books contained wrong information about the ruler, who was known for rocket artillery. 
The Additional City Civil and Sessions court on Tuesday issued the temporary injunction restraining the author, publisher Ayodhya Publication and printer Rashtrotthana Mudranalaya from selling the book titled ‘Tipu Nija Kanasugalu’ (Real Dreams of Tipu) and written by Rangayana director Addanda C Cariappa, till 3 December.
“The Defendant No.1 to 3 and the persons and the agents claiming through or under them are restrained by way of temporary injunction from distributing and also selling including on-line platform, the book by name “Tippu Nija Kanasugalu” written in Kannada language,” it said in its order. 
However, “This order of injunction will not come in the way of the defendant No.1 to 3 from printing the said books at their risk and storing the books which are already printed,” the court said. 
A suit was filed by former Chairman of the District Wakf Board Committee, BS Rafiulla, claiming that the book contains wrong information on Tipu without any support or justification from history. He also submitted that the word “turukaru“ used in the book is a derogatory remark against the Muslim community. 
He contended that the publication of the book would cause unrest and communal disharmony, disturbing the public peace at large. Accepting his contentions, the Court said, “If the contents of the play are false and it contains false information about Tipu Sultan, and if the same are distributed, it would cause irreparable loss to the plaintiff and there are chances of breach of communal peace and harmony and there is a danger to the public peace.” 
“If the book is circulated pending appearance of the defendants, the purpose of the application itself would be defeated. It is common knowledge that the controversial books sell like hot cakes. Therefore, at this stage the balance of convenience is in favour of the plaintiff in granting the order of injunction,” the judge observed. 
The court issued emergent notices to the three respondents and adjourned the hearing of the case to 3 December. Muslim groups had earlier staged protest against the book.
Download the Mint app and read premium stories
Log in to our website to save your bookmarks. It’ll just take a moment.
You are just one step away from creating your watchlist!
Oops! Looks like you have exceeded the limit to bookmark the image. Remove some to bookmark this image.
Your session has expired, please login again.
You are now subscribed to our newsletters. In case you can’t find any email from our side, please check the spam folder.
This is a subscriber only feature Subscribe Now to get daily updates on WhatsApp


Leave a Comment